“The Halifax Chat With H.E President Abdullah Gul”

Yazdır Paylaş Yazıları Büyült Yazıları Küçült

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

I am very pleased to participate in the Halifax International Security Forum, which I have followed with great interest in the last five years.

I started my active political career in 1991 which overlapped with the First Gulf War and the Middle East Peace Conference held in Madrid right after that. The leaders of the time were very much aware of the complex links and indirect interaction between the Palestine problem, the nervous center of the region, and other problems in the Middle East. These links are unfortunately still there.

Since that day I have witnessed many initiatives, plans, projects and contacts launched in order to resolve various conflicts in the Middle East.

I personally contributed to some of these processes as a member of the parliament, Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and finally President of the republic. Even there were cases, where I took personal initatives.

In deed, the international community spent an immense deal of energy in creating permanent peace, stability and cooperation in the Middle East. It made political investments and mobilized intellectual and financial resources.

In this context, I would like to express my appreciation for the sincere and unfaltering efforts of the US administrations from both parties, including President Obama, Foreign Secretary Kerry, Senator McCain, Senator Mitchell and other politicians and diplomats.

To this, I should also add the Saudi King Abdullah, who submitted an invaluable plan known by his own name, other actors in the region, as well as efforts by the United Nations, European Union and Russia.

Unfortunately, the efforts spanning the quarter of a century since the Madrid conference have not yielded the desired results. The modest progress achieved was sometimes sabotaged or remained insufficient.

Moreover, thousands of innocent people both in the region and outside have fallen victim to violence or terror originating from the Middle East. Survivors have fostered feelings of spite, hatred and revenge. The tragedy experienced by the people of Gaza last summer, the atrocious murders of Isis and victims at the synagogue in Jerusalem last week are the most recent examples. The despicable terrorist acts which took place in Canada last month, thousands of kilometers away from the region was also a recent example to how contagious violence can be.

Today we stand at a point where the situation has become graver, let along progress. While Saddam Hussein was the only threat in 1991, the threats have been multiplied, creating a cumulative effect. In 1991, President Bush and President Gorbachev had held the Madrid peace conference jointly. Whereas today, the US and Russia are no longer able to function together in the Middle East due to the distracting effect of the conflicts in Ukraine.

Following the First Gulf War, UN Security Council Resolution 687 stipulating the disarmament of Iraq became operational. Let me remind you that this resolution also included a perspective and a provision on the freeing the region from weapons of mass destruction. This provision which had secured Arab support in the Gold War still stands solely as a promise that is far from being fulfilled except the conference initiated by President Obama in 2010.

The key term to express the gravity of the situation in the region at present can be “frustration”. This frustration can explain both the reasons and consequences of the conflicts. Indeed, the elite of the region and the international community are deeply disappointed at the face of the failure to solve the problems in the Middle East, and particularly in Palestine, and the further aggravation of these problems. We should expect that such disappointments and frustrations will have consequences, one way, or another.

Let me step away from pessimism for a moment and draw some lessons from a few positive signals and trends I have observed in the recent months:

a) The clearance of Syria from chemical weapons has been a notable development. This has also proven that joint efforts yield results when it comes to the common goal of the international community with regard to freeing of the region from weapons of mass destruction.

b) Another step further in the same field, but perhaps more importantly, is the expectations that talks on Iran’s nuclear programme may bear positive results. If this happens, it will be a great victory of multilateral mechanisms and win-win diplomacy. I am pleased to note that I have been involved in various phases of this process as Foreign Minister or President, either during visits to Teheran or hosting contacts in Turkey. I have been the only NATO Ally leader who spoke this issues directly to the religious leader of Iran Ayetollah Khamenei.

c) If Iran nuclear talks reach success, this will have strategic, political and economic consequences both in the region and the world. So, all parties should act carefully and cautiously in the post-solution era. A solution to the nuclear file may create a difference by leading Iran to be more motivated about the resolution of political problems in the region and to opt to use its soft power henceforth.

d) Another important but belated development is the establishment of a more inclusive Iraqi government with a broader base. This is has been enabled by the common sense and coordinated efforts of actors in and outside of Iraq. This has reminded me of the meetings of the Foreign Ministers of Countries Neighboring Iraq which I launched during my time as prime minister in 2003 during the Second Gulf War. Both before and after the war, we had somewhat managed to hold nine senior-level meetings with P-5 and regional organizations as countries bordering Iraq around a common agenda and carried out deliberations and coordinated activities. Therefore, I believe that the new Iraqi government should be encouraged and support with a similar understanding.

e) Positive signs regarding the resolution of disagreements between the Iraqi Regional Kurdish Government and the Iraqi government about the political issues and financial problems in connection with oil revenues are further worthy of mention. The dropping of the possibility of a referendum on independence from the agenda in the Kurdish Region, for the moment, is also good news for stability in Iraq and the region.

f) Another major step forward is the coalition formed against ISIS. The first positive military outcomes in the field have already been observed. However “hard power” alone will not be a solution. The ultimate solution lies in patient and inclusive political solutions which will help convince the local people and leaders in Syria and Iraq who have been lured to enter the dictate of ISIS because of despair, frustration and lack of hope. Political transition and exit strategies must be considered already now and mistakes once committed in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria should not be repeated. Possible solutions should take the political and socio-economic imbalances of states into account and must be morally superior. This is because ISIS is a phenomenon where all diseases of the region, including political, ideological, economic and social ones, have crystallized.

g) Another interesting trend in the region is the decision by some European countries, parties and parliaments to recognize the state of Palestine. This trend reflects a serious disappointment about the deadlock regarding a possible solution in Palestine. I hope that this trend will contribute to the efforts of the parties in Israel and Palestine defending peaceful settlement and encourage them. When I was elected the President of the Republic in 2007, Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas and Israeli President Shimon Perez came to Ankara to congratulate me and addressed the Turkish Grand National Assembly jointly. That atmosphere can and must be reinstated for a permanent solution. It is in everybody’s interest that the Israeli government acts with restraint regarding its policies on the settlements and Al-Aqsa Mosque.

h) I would also like to touch upon the Arab Spring. The bad news is that the first wave of the Arab Spring has been disrupted, except in Tunisia. The good news, on the other hand, is that the expectations, yearnings and concerns of Arab peoples’ are still alive and valid. Demands raised during the Arab Spring such as democracy, good governance, human rights, transparency, gender equality, social justice and freedom of thought will continue to prevail the agenda. Just like the ideals and principles of the 1789 French Revolution, which were realized in France and the world decades after the revolution despite the fact that the revolution had been reversed by the restoration of monarchy.

i) Likewise, there is a vision in the region regarding the setting up of a cooperation and security system similar to that of OSCE, Organization for Security and Development in Europe. This is a vision that has been around since the 1980s and worked out intellectually. This vision must be kept alive and remain a part of the agenda despite the current unfavorable conditions. Such a long-term strategy will provide a perspective and an anchor for efforts geared towards the solution of other problems. This strategy will also require a very strong economic cooperation dimension that encompasses energy and water issues.

The positive developments I have referred to above include some possibilities, lessons and clues. I believe that we can make a difference if all of these are tackled by political actors within a holistic and strategic approach, with a constructive mentality and on common ground. This will serve peace and stability, not only for the people of the Middle East, but also for the whole world.

Yazdır Paylaş Yukarı